Developing a Thesis Statement
Author: Writing Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison
Published 1999 Creating a
Framework
Readers of your papers will want you to do more than
just randomly lay out information. Typically readers
of college papers will expect you to make a point--that
is, argue a thesis--by selecting material and using
it in a logical order that both supports and clarifies
your thinking about your topic. They will expect you
to announce your main points in predictable places:
At the end of your introduction (your thesis statement)
and
At the beginning of each paragraph or block of thought
(your topic sentences).
The thesis statement and the topic sentences provide
the framework for your paper.
For the writer, the thesis statement:
- Serves as a planning tool.
- Helps the writer determine the paper's real focus
and clarify the relationship between idea.
- Becomes a hook on which the writer can "hang"
the sub-theses or the topic sentences that present
evidence in support of the argument.
- Anticipates questions about the topic and provides
the unifying thread between pieces of information.
For the reader, the thesis statement:
- Serves as a "map" to follow through
the paper.
- Prepares the reader to read.
- Keeps the reader focused on the argument
- Helps the reader spot the main ideas.
- Engages the reader in the argument.
- Offers enough detail for your reader to grasp
your argument.
Thus, a thesis statement:
- Makes an argumentative assertion about a topic;
it states the conclusions that you have reached
about your topic.
- Makes a promise to the reader about the scope,
purpose, and direction of your paper.
- Is focused and specific enough to be "proven"
within the boundaries of your paper.
- Is generally located near the end of the introduction;
sometimes, in a long paper, the thesis will be expressed
in several sentences or in an entire paragraph.
- Identifies the relationship between the pieces
of evidence that you are using to support your argument.
Choosing a Topic
Your topic is the subject about which you will write.
Your assignment may suggest several ways of looking
at a topic; or it may name a fairly general concept
that you will explore or analyze in your paper. The
first step is to read about your topic in several
sources, or generate as much information as possible
through an analysis of your topic. Obviously, the
more material or knowledge you have, the more possibilities
will be available for a strong argument.
As you consider your options, you must decide to
focus on one aspect of your topic. This means that
you cannot include everything you've learned about
your topic nor should you go off in several directions.
If you end up covering too many different aspects
of a topic, your paper will sprawl and be unconvincing
in its argument.
Before you go too far, however, ask yourself whether
your topic is worthy of your efforts. Try to avoid
topics that already have too much written about them
or that simply are not important. These topics may
lead to a thesis that is either dry fact or a weird
claim that cannot be supported. A good thesis falls
somewhere between the two extremes. To arrive at this
point, ask yourself what is new, interesting, contestable,
or controversial about your topic.
For example, in an assignment that asks you to analyze
Spain's neutrality in World War II, you may decide
to focus on Franco's role in the diplomatic relationships
between the Allies and the Axis. This is your topic.
Looking for Patterns
From Topic to Thesis Statement
Once you have a topic, you will have to decide what
the main point of your paper will be. This point,
the "controlling idea," becomes the core
of your argument (thesis statement) and it is the
unifying idea to which you will relate all your sub-theses.
To find out what this "point" is, you have
to examine and evaluate your evidence.
As you consider your evidence, you may notice patterns
emerging, data repeated in more than one source, or
facts that favor one view more than another. These
patterns or data may then lead you to some conclusions
about your topic and suggest that you can successfully
argue for one idea better than another.
For instance, you might find out that Franco first
tried to negotiate with the Axis; but when he couldn't
get some concessions that he wanted from them, he
turned to the Allies. As you read more about Franco's
decisions, you may conclude that Spain's neutrality
in WWII occurred for an entirely personal reason:
his desire to preserve his own (and France's) power.
Based on this conclusion, you can then write a trial
thesis statement to help you decide what material
belongs in your paper.
Sometimes you won't be able to find a focus or identify
your "spin" or specific argument immediately.
Like some writers, you might begin with a purpose
statement just to get yourself going. A purpose statement
is one or more sentences that announce your topic
and indicate the structure of the paper but do not
state the conclusions you have drawn. Thus, you might
begin with something like this:
This paper will look at modern language to see if it
reflects male dominance or female oppression.
OR
I plan to analyze anger and derision in offensive language
to see if they represent a challenge of society's authority.
At some point, you can turn a purpose statement
into a thesis statement. As you think and write about
your topic, you can restrict, clarify, and refine
your argument, crafting your thesis statement to reflect
your thinking.
To learn more about the differences between thesis
and purpose statements, take a look at our handout,
Thesis Statements and Purpose Statements.
Strategies That Work
Developing a Thesis Statement
If you are writing a paper that will have an argumentative
thesis and are having trouble getting started, these
techniques may help you develop a temporary or "working"
thesis statement.
1. As mentioned earlier, begin with a purpose statement
(which you will later turn into a thesis statement).
Assignment: Discuss the history of the Reform Party
and explain its influence on the 1990 presidential
and Congressional election.
Purpose Statement: This paper briefly sketches the
history of the grassroots, conservative, Perot-led
Reform Party and analyzes how it influenced the economic
and social ideologies of the two mainstream parties.
2. If your assignment asks a specific question(s),
turn the question(s) into an assertion and give reasons
why it is true or reasons for your opinion.
Assignment: What do Aylmer and Rappaccini have to
be proud of? Why aren't they satisfied with these
things? How does pride, as demonstrated in "The
Birthmark" and "Rappaccini's Daughter,"
lead to unexpected problems?
Beginning thesis statement: Alymer and Rappaccinni
are proud of their great knowledge; however, they
are also very greedy and are driven to use their knowledge
to alter some aspect of nature as a test of their
ability. Evil results when they try to "play
God."
3. Write a sentence that summarizes the main idea
of the essay you plan to write:
Main idea: The reason some toys succeed in the market
is that they appeal to the consumers' sense of the
ridiculous and their basic desire to laugh at themselves.
4. Spend time "mulling over" your topic.
When you feel that you understand what you want to
write, make a list of the ideas that you want to include;
consider the ideas and try to group them. Often a
focus and an organizational plan will emerge as you
think about this list. This process often will lead
to a "working thesis."
5. Use a formula to arrive at a working thesis statement
(you will revise this later). Here are some examples:
A. Although most readers of _______ have argued that
_______, closer examination shows that _______.
B. _______ uses _______ and _____ to prove that ________.
C. Phenomenon X is a result of the combination of
__________, __________, and _________.
Beginning statements such as these can serve as a
framework for planning or drafting your paper, but
remember they're not yet the specific argumentative
thesis you want for the final version of your paper.
In fact, in its first stages, a thesis statement usually
is ill-formed or rough and serves only as a planning
tool. As you write, you may discover evidence that
does not fit your temporary or "working"
thesis. Or you may reach deeper insights about your
topic as you do more research, and you will find that
your thesis statement has to be more complicated to
match the evidence that you want to use.
You must be willing to reject or omit some evidence
in order to keep your paper cohesive and your reader
focused. Or you may have to revise your thesis to
match the evidence and insights that you want to discuss.
Read your draft carefully, noting the conclusions
you have drawn and the major ideas which support or
prove those conclusions. These will be the elements
of your final thesis statement. Sometimes you will
not be able to identify these elements in your early
drafts; but as you consider how your argument is developing
and how your evidence supports your main idea, ask
yourself, "What is the main point that I want
to prove/discuss?" and "How will I convince
the reader that this is true?" When you can answer
these questions, then you can begin to refine the
thesis statement.
The Refining Process
Here's an example that shows how you might refine
your thesis statement during writing and revising.
Suppose you are given this assignment:
Choose an activity and define it as a symbol of American
culture. Your essay should cause the reader to think
critically about the society which produces and enjoys
that activity.
You might begin writing by using a temporary thesis
like this:
The phenomenon of drive-in facilities is an interesting
symbol of American culture, and these facilities demonstrate
significant characteristics of our society.
As you think and write, you realize that this statement
is vague and lacking in substance. Surely no one would
question that drive-ins are a symbol of our culture
or that they reveal something about Americans. Also,
this statement does not fulfill the assignment because
it does not require the reader to think critically
about society. To find a contestable issue here (one
about which you can say something that isn't obvious--that
readers might not believe until they read your paper),
you need to ask questions about your statement. One
approach would be to ask which specific characteristics
drive-ins symbolize.
Drive-ins are an interesting symbol of American culture
because they represent Americans' significant creativity
and business ingenuity.
This statement is more precise in that it identifies
two American characteristics that drive-ins appear
to symbolize: creativity and ingenuity. But this assertion
also seems to be one that few would argue with. Again,
as the saying goes, "Tell me something I don't
already know."
To discover a more focused thesis, you need to push
further: question each part of your thesis statement.
Obviously there are different types of "drive-in"
businesses; you wouldn't want to make the same argument
about all of them. Do some drive-in facilities embody
creativity and/or business ingenuity more than others?
What exactly do you mean by creativity? By business
ingenuity? By interesting? How do we evaluate these
qualities? Pursuing such questions could lead you
to countless lines of thought and as many different
conclusions or theses.
A. Among the types of drive-in facilities familiar
during the twentieth century, drive-in movie theaters
best represent American creativity, not merely because
they were the forerunner of later drive-ins and drive-throughs,
but because of their impact on our culture: they changed
our relationship to the automobile, changed the way
people experienced movies, and changed movie-going
into a family activity.
This statement introduces a new idea, and it is the
first statement that is arguable to some extent. The
new information is that drive-in movies were forerunners
of later developments and that they had an impact
on our culture.
Don't settle on the first good thesis that comes
along; instead investigate some alternatives. Note
that other questions could have led you to other arguments.
For example, you could have asked whether drive-in
businesses symbolize anything negative about our culture.
You might then have arrived at an idea such as this:
While drive-in facilities such as those at fast-food
establishments, banks, pharmacies, and dry cleaners
symbolize America's economic ingenuity, they also
have affected our personal standards.
Here you have another contestable idea. Notice that
this sentence is different in structure from the one
you started with ("Drive-ins represent Americans'
creativity and business ingenuity"). The "factual"
information in the earlier statement has been incorporated
into a dependent clause ("While drive-ins . .
. ingenuity"). The contestable part of your idea
then appears in the independent clause ("they
also have affected our personal standards").
In other words, you are no longer focusing on a claim
that most people would agree with; instead you are
using the obvious as a point of departure for an idea
you will need to "prove."
Let's look more critically at this thesis, though.
Again it is a bit vague. You need to specify what
you mean by "personal standards."
B. While drive-in facilities such as those at fast-
food restaurants, banks, pharmacies, and dry cleaners
symbolize _Americans' business ingenuity, they also
have contributed _ to an increasing homogenization
of our culture, _ a willingness to depersonalize relationships
with others, and _ a tendency to sacrifice quality
for convenience.
This statement is now specific and fulfills all parts
of the assignment. This version, like any good thesis,
is not self-evident; its points, 1-4, will have to
be proven with evidence in the body of the paper.
The numbers in statement B indicate the order in which
the points will be presented. Depending on the length
of the paper, there could be one paragraph for each
numbered item or there could be blocks of paragraph
for even pages for each one. (You would not use numbers
in a thesis for your paper; they are used here merely
for illustration.)
Notice that the first point also is a counter argument
to the heart of your thesis. To be convincing, you
have to acknowledge your opposition so that you won't
leave yourself open to obvious challenges to your
argument. You strengthen your point of view if you
anticipate and address your readers' questions. This
approach also demonstrates that you have thought objectively
about your topic. And it shows your willingness to
engage the reader in your argument. The best place
to address the opposition is before you actually discuss
the points that favor your view. Thus you will first
address the issue of Americans' ingenuity because
this cannot be ignored; but you will then move on
to your major points which comprise the strongest
part of your paper.
Statements A and B are stronger than their predecessors
because each makes a specific, contestable point.
They deal with narrower topics and have more substance.
Note also that the words "interesting" and
"significant" have been dropped from the
first, temporary thesis; these words are hard to define
and thus make a flimsy basis for argument.
The Bottom Line
As you move through the process of crafting a thesis,
you need to remember a couple of things:
1) Context matters! Think about your course materials
and lectures. Try to relate your thesis to the ideas
your instructor is discussing.
2) As you go through the process described above,
always keep your assignment in mind. You will be more
successful when your thesis (and paper) responds to
the assignment than if it argues a semi-related idea.
3) Your thesis statement should be precise, focused,
and contestable; it should predict the sub-theses
or blocks of information that you will use to prove
your argument.
In the beginning, the thesis statement was a tool
to help you sharpen your focus, limit material and
establish the paper's purpose. When your paper is
finished, however, the thesis statement becomes a
tool for your reader. It tells the reader what you
have learned about your topic and what evidence led
you to your conclusion. It keeps the reader on track--well
able to understand and appreciate your argument.
© Writing Center, University of Wisconsin 1999
|